No-Deal means 87% of imported goods to be subject to zero tariffs.


Journalist Robert Peston posted a Twitter thread today on the UK government giving away its most important bargaining chip, its leverage, in case of a no-deal Brexit.



In case you missed it:




This government claims one of the great benefits of Brexit would be to negotiate free trade deals with countries outside the EU. So some would say it is EXTRAORDINARY that it has today announced that if the UK leaves the EU without a deal, it would voluntarily increase the proportion of imported goods that are subject to zero tariffs from 80% to 87%.

This is to give away its most important bargaining chip, its leverage, when negotiating free trade deals with non-EU countries. Its motive is a perfectly laudable one — namely to protect households from the inflationary impact of withdrawing from the EU’s single market (as a matter of principle, the Treasury always put the spending power of consumers ahead of protecting businesses).

But some would say it makes a nonsense of the Prime Minister’s red line that any negotiated Brexit with the EU has to enhance the unilateral ability of the UK to negotiate free trade deals with any country it likes.

Why does she apparently value this unilateral ability to do free trade deals with other countries so little in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

To put it another way, my presumption is the Treasury’s publication today of the tariff schedule for a no-deal Brexit will have an important political impact, on the Brexit debate.

It will put wind in the sales of the Labour Party and rebel Tory MPs who believe that the Prime Minister’s decision to rule out membership of a customs union, because it would proscribe free trade deals with non-EU countries, is one of her more bonkers decisions.

And if some would see the hidden hand of the Chancellor, Philip Hammond, in adding momentum to the cross party campaign to keep the UK in the customs union, in whatever version of Brexit may (or may not) be ultimately agreed, that may not be fantasy or mad conspiracy.


The above text was first published as a Twitter thread and turned into text-only by PMP Magazine. It is unredacted. It may have been minorly edited to remove abbreviations and spelling mistakes in order to be more readable. The author of the tweets wrote in a personal capacity. The tweets are public. (Source: Twitter) —




Liked this story?
Found it useful?
Heres what you can do next:


Support our magazine!

Share this story on social media.



(This is an original piece, first published by the PMP Magazine.)


Creative Commons License

(Cover: Pixabay.)


Author image
Interesting Twitter threads you might have missed, turned into articles.
London, UK

About us | Our Writers | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Submissions | Code of Conduct


No part of this publication may be reproduced or used without the express permission of the publisher.