In which I take issue view that China clamping down on Hong Kong doesn’t matter that much economically, because it’s already a minnow. True, but not everything that counts can be counted, and Hong Kong still offers China significantly capital, clout and kudos.




Over the last few weeks of protests in Hong Kong, culminating in the violence in the Legco building last week, most people have rightly concluded that:

- at best the end of the ‘one country two systems’  m.o. will be hastened;

- all the sooner, if the protests don’t fade away as they did after the 2014 Occupy movement; and

- what happens in Hong Kong will have a meaningful impact on Taiwan, where next January’s presidential elections may now see the country distance itself further from Beijing with uncertain consequences as to the latter’s subsequent behaviour towards the ‘renegade province’.

I want to take issue, though, with those that argue that Hong Kong isn’t that important to China any more, and that the CCP will do what it has to do there without loss or restraint.

It is of course true that since the handover, Hong Kong’s share of the combined GDP of China and Hong Kong has fallen from about 16 to roughly 3 per cent. And further, Hong Kong’s share of total exports has collapsed from over 50 to not much more than 13 per cent. On this basis, you can see Hong Kong as a much diminished region on greater China – the consequence largely of the Mainland’s phenomenal growth since 1997.

Yet, as Albert Einstein reportedly opined, not everything that can be counted counts, but not everything that counts can be counted. So, while the GDP and trade significance of Hong Kong has dissipated, it retains a crucial role in other respects, largely to do with its modern raison’ d’être, namely as a leading financial centre. Shanghai may be China’s principal financial centre, and China’s many free trade zones may now stand tall over Hong Kong, but none of them can really compete with what Hong Kong is and does.

Hong Kong police fired tear gas at the protesters, 14 June 2019. / VOA - Iris Tong

In the first place, Hong Kong is still a rule of law territory, famed for the quality of its regulatory oversight, low taxation, free movement of capital, and use of the world’s business language, English. Talent has flocked to Hong Kong to build the most mature and sophisticated money and capital markets in Asia, though Singapore may beg to differ. It has developed and propagated the many ancillary services that make finance for enterprise and investment work, such as those in law, financial expertise, securities structuring and trading, accounting and fintech. These sources of expertise are of crucial significance to the Mainland, but the operating in environment in Hong Kong engenders trust in its institutions and affords many people preferred conditions for working and living. In global surveys of economic freedom and operating businesses, such as those published by the World Bank and the Fraser Institute, Hong Kong continues to lead Asia and the world.

More directly, perhaps, Hong Kong is a crucial conduit of foreign capital into Chinese equity and bond markets, of foreign borrowing in US dollars – on which China is becoming more dependent now that the balance of payments position is much weaker, and of inward investment. Almost half of inward investment into China comes from Hong Kong, and while Taiwan is an important source, so are Mainland companies. They are in effect ‘round-tripping’, that is, using the advantages enjoyed by Hong Kong as a base from which to invest in the Mainland. The Hong Kong stock exchange may now be dwarfed by the exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen, but its capitalisation is still the fourth largest in the world, and the third largest in Asia, after China and Tokyo. About half the companies listed on the exchange are Mainland companies. Hong Kong remains a significant venue for companies that want to do IPO’s and trace finance: in 2018 it was bigger than New York on both counts. Alibaba announced recently that it was reconsidering the New York market and looking at a $20 billion secondary listing in Hong Kong, which it had rejected in 2013.

Further, China has used Hong Kong to both pilot and experiment with financial innovation and liberalisation, and promote the (mostly futile) campaign to internationalise the Renminbi. I say futile, because as some of us tirelessly explain, you can encourage central banks and traders to use your currency more in transactions, but you can’t really make progress in internationalising your currency in the absence of balance of payments deficits in perpetuity, or open and freely mobile capital transactions. And China wants neither.

In many ways, then, Hong Kong is still China’s financial window on the world, and the rest of the world’s financial window on China. Hong Kong lends China capital, clout and kudos. Beijing knows all of this, of course, and is reluctant to lose the advantages that Hong Kong confers.

Yet politics is politics, and the CCP’s mission is to rule unchallenged. It cannot tolerate anti-China or democracy protests in Hong Kong without looking weak. It is therefore only a question of time before a more heavy-handed clamp down on Hong Kong. This may take the form of greater restrictions on and tighter controls in Hong Kong, if the protests fade, or more dramatic intervention, if not. For Beijing, Hong Kong’s financial and commercial advantages are a price worth paying if the alternative is a threat to the party’s rule. Yet, we should not be coaxed into thinking this won’t matter. It most certainly will.🔷



Share this article now:



Have you got a story to share

with our readers?

You can share your experience today

by submitting your story to us:

Tell us your story now!




Here’s what you can

also do next:


Support our writers! Support our magazine!

Share this story on social media. Get the PMP Newsletter.




[This piece was originally published on George Magnus’ blog. | The author writes in a personal capacity.]

Creative Commons License
(Cover: Wikimedia/Daily Mail. - Hong Kong protest. Aerial view of the protesting crowd in Causeway Bay. | 16 June 2019. / Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.)



     

THE AUTHOR

Author image

Economist, Author and Commentator. Associate at the China Centre, Oxford University, and adviser to some asset management companies. Former Chief Economist at UBS. Global macro, China, demography.

London, UK. Articles in PMP Magazine Website